“All the living and the dead” were “in for a night.” The Misses Morkan’s annual dance was a fully accompanied one, with everybody who knew them coming. Along with the food and the well-decorated house, the party was quite elegant and grand. However, what should have been a lively gathering seemed to be rather dead.
The Old Square Piano |
Though
it is unusual that the annual dance, as it is a dance party, was static, on one
hand it allowed Gabriel to think, to ponder. Gabriel’s random thoughts are
expressed through his stream of consciousness, in which James Joyce conveys his
ideas about the nature of thought. According to Joyce, every thought tends to
be personal, with each consciousness always changing and sensibly continuous.
This is why Gabriel’s emotions and perceptions seem to flow, with no break in
between to separate one from another, eventually building up to form a sense of
Gabriel as one entity. That his thoughts sometimes do not appear to be coherent
clearly depicts life as an ongoing process where sometimes, nothing happens. As
Sigmund Freud mentioned in his analysis of the human psyche, the unconscious
may be a barrier to recognizing the truth, due to the appearance of once
repressed thoughts on the surface. This illuminates Gabriel’s epiphany, or the
sudden realizing that “one by one, [people] were all becoming shades.”
Everything
goes on in Gabriel’s mind and also in an unattended moment, both
characteristics of the “Joycean Epiphany.” This sudden spiritual manifestation,
showing a phase of mind itself, does not occur when one wants it to, but when
it is most unexpected. One would think that Gabriel would encounter his
enlightening moment while giving a speech or perhaps while perusing through his
thoughts when Mary Jane plays the music, but no, he does so when he looks outside
the window and sees the snow, imagining a young boy with gorgeous eyes
shivering beneath the tree. Focusing on the “whatness,” the “Joycean Epiphany” refers
to the way a person perceives things. In “The Dead,” Gretta’s confession of her
past yet still memorable love startles Gabriel, causing him to overthrow his original
attitude towards the world and start focusing on the genuine meaning rather
than the outer looks. Before the shift, the word “eyes” appears twenty-eight
times, highlighting how important appearance is to Gabriel, but afterwards,
actual expressions of emotions can be noticed.
“Therefore,
I will not linger on the past,” states Gabriel, quite firmly in his speech at
dinner. His dislike for clinging onto the past can be seen even in his slightest
acts, such as him vigorously scraping his feet and trying to get rid of the
snow, which symbolizes the past and the oppression deriving from it, on his goloshes.
Gabriel seems rather strict about his feelings, and he apparently controls his
own thoughts, filtering them by the standard of whether or not it is relevant
to the present. This value, however, is shattered by Gretta’s story of her
relationship with Michael Fuery, whom she thinks to have died for her. Although
he was the one who had emphasized the need for people to forget about the past,
he changes; he is jealous and angry when Gretta could not stop talking about
how sweet a boy Michael Fuery was, and “generous tears fill[ed] Gabriel’s eyes”
when he discovered the passionate love between Gretta and Michael. He starts
yearning for the liveliness of romance that he had never had.
No
longer is Gabriel obsessed with his belief that one must live in the present
and the present only. He recognizes that the past and the present coexist, and
that actually, as in the time of his epiphany, the dead may be more alive than
the living.
“He
is dead,” says Gretta.
Is he really?
Is he really?
*
* *
Traditionally,
an epiphany is defined to be a flash of recognition in which someone or
something is seen in a new light, oftentimes conveying a divine touch. To me,
though, an epiphany is when you suddenly “get it,” when everything falls into
place, enabling you to realize something that you had no clue of beforehand. It
could be as simple as Ella’s sudden realization that she could “unspell”
herself from obeying everyone’s orders in the movie of “Ella Enchanted.”
I
used to believe in the black-and-white theory to some extent, just assuming
that if there was a good, there was a bad. Over the past few years, though, as
I saw friends overcome conflicts with one another and more especially as I
worked in the judicial council, I came to realize that there was no such thing
as a right answer. There can never be a strict line drawn in between two
opposite things, although there are exceptions in cases like gender. Tomatoes,
for instance, are concerned in ongoing debates endlessly arguing whether they
are vegetables or fruits. Similarly, I had an epiphany when I came to know that
the same situation can be seen in various perspectives, each view having its
own reasoning or story. You know what they say: Every side has its own story.
I'm happy to see original stuff here that other students haven't focused on. I like your creative intro, and the development of the ideas. BUT, you say this about the party: Spirit, liveliness, and pleasure were nowhere to be found.
ReplyDeleteReally? While that party was by no means a KMLA Christmas party, it wasn't that bad! In fact, by the end, everyone seems to have had a good timel; even Gabriel is getting into things, feeling the wine, and galloping around like a horse. So I don't think Joyce is wanting to create an image of a "dead" party. He is, however, showing us people who are stuck in their ways, and relying on traditions.
While you are a bit off on the party, the rest is solid.